<<<  Back

2023, № 103

UDC: 636.5.033:637.5
GSNTI: 68.39.15

New protein-vitamin mineral feed additive for broiler chickens

The poultry industry in the Krasnodar Territory is experiencing an increased need for high-quality, balanced feed for farm animals, at the same time, livestock farms are striving to reduce the cost of their products. It is proposed to solve this problem by replacing the fishmeal in the feed with a high-protein concentrate obtained from the larvae of the Hermetia Illucens fly, since the protein concentrate obtained from them is a good source of fat and protein, amino acids, calcium and phosphorus. The introduction of grape flour into the composition of the additive allows enriching the diet with micro and macro elements and essential amino acids, fiber. The probiotic complex included in the feed additive improves the digestive processes in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby improving the body's immune processes. An experimental composition of a feed additive for young poultry was developed. Experimental studies were carried out in poultry farms of the Republic of Adygea, Khoshekhablsky district on two groups of week-old chickens with an average live weight of 155-158 g, 100 heads in each group. Animals of the control group were fed with a general diet, and animals of the experimental group were fed with the same general diet with the addition of the declared combined feed additive in the amount of 5% in the diet. According to the technological map, weighing was carried out at the age of 7 days (formation of groups), 17 days, 29 days and 42 days. By the end of the experiment, the live weight of the experimental group broiler chickens that received the feed additive was higher than that of the animals of the control group and amounted to 2818 g, while the chickens of the control group that received the main diet, on average, weighed 2578 g.
Keywords: Broiler chickens, feed additive, weight gain, diet.
DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-103-242-246

References:

1. ГОСТ 13496.15 - 2016. Корма, комбикорма, комбикормовое сырье. Методы определения массовой доли сырого жира. - Москва: Стандартинформ, 2016. - 12 с.
2. ГОСТ 26570 - 95. Корма, комбикорма, комбикормовое сырье. Методы определения кальция. - Минск: Изд-во стандартов, 2003. - 16 с.
3. ГОСТ 26657 - 97. Корма, комбикорма, комбикормовое сырье. Методы определения содержания фосфора. - Минск: Изд-во стандартов, 2003. - 12 с.
4. ГОСТ 31640 - 2012. Корма. Методы определения содержания сухого вещества. - Москва: Стандартинформ, 2012. - 11 с.
5. ГОСТ 31675 - 2012. Корма. Методы определения содержания сырой клетчатки с применением промежуточной фильтрации. - Москва: Стандартинформ, 2020. - 12 с.
6. ГОСТ 32044.1 - 2012. Корма, комбикорма, комбикормовое сырье. Определение массовой доли азота и вычисление массовой доли сырого протеина. - Москва: Стандартинформ, 2014. - 15 с.
7. ГОСТ 32933 - 2014. Корма, комбикорма. Метод определения содержания сырой золы. - Москва: Стандартинформ, 2020. - 12 с.
8. Забашта, С. Н. Иммуномодулирующая кормовая добавка для цыплят / С. Н. Забашта // Сб. науч. трудов КРИА ДПО ФГБОУ ВПО Кубанский ГАУ. - Краснодар, 2015. - С. 31-37.
9. Лазарев, С. Э. Оценка влияния пробиотического комплекса Пролаксим-В на показатели роста и микробиоценоз птицы / С. Э. Лазарев, Н. Н. Забашта, П. В. Мирошниченко, Е. П. Лисовицкая // Сб-к научных трудов КНЦЗВ. - Краснодар, 2021. - Т. 10. - № 2. - С. 14-17.
10. Птичий бум. На Кубани стремительно увеличивается производство и экспорт мяса птицы [Электронный ресурс] - Режим доступа: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4594645 (дата обращения: 02.02.2023).
11. Степовой, А. В. Перспективы использования вторичных ресурсов виноделия в кормлении сельскохозяйственных животных в краснодарском крае / А. В. Степовой, Н. Н. Забашта, О. Б. Данильченко, А. А. Нестеренко // Тр. КубГАУ. - 2022. - Вып. 95. - С. 185-188.

Authors:

1. Stepovoy Artem Vasilievich, PhD in Technology, assistant professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”.
2. Zabashta Nikolai Nikolaevich, DSc in Agriculture, Professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”; FSBSI "Krasnodar Research Centre for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine".
3. Danilchenko Olesya Bogdanovna, PhD in Biology, FSBSI "Krasnodar Research Centre for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine".
4. Miroshnichenko Petr Vasilievich, PhD in Veterinary, assistant professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”; FSBSI "Krasnodar Research Centre for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine".
5. Lisovitskaya Ekaterina Petrovna, PhD in Technology, assistant professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”; FSBSI "Krasnodar Research Centre for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine".