<<<  Back

2022, № 101

UDC: 338.43
GSNTI: 68.75.21

Using rural research tools: practical aspects

The management of the integrated development of rural areas aims not only to improve the quality of life of the rural population, but also to promote the comprehensive economic and social development of the village. As effectiveness conditions for the integrated development of rural areas, one can single out: ensuring the competitiveness of territories, profitability and financial well-being of existing subjects of the rural economy, positive dynamics in the standard of living of citizens. Agricultural production can be singled out as the basic type of activity of the subjects of the rural economy. A rather multifaceted functioning of the countryside necessitates the formation of an extensive instrumental apparatus for its study. Sociological research can be singled out as one of the most versatile applied tools for studying targeted subject areas of rural development. By organizing and conducting a sociological survey, the authors obtained the results of an assessment by the population of the feasibility of forming a database covering the best practices for the integrated development of rural areas. To obtain systematic results, the survey was conducted not only by rural residents, but also by citizens living on the territory of urban-type municipalities. According to the generalized results of the study, respondents recognize the high importance of state and municipal programs in the system of integrated development of rural areas. The vast majority of the citizens surveyed are sure that assistance to the functioning of the transport and social infrastructure can be singled out as priority areas for development. Since the vast majority of respondents note the need for the functioning of information bases that combine the best practices in the development of rural areas, it seems appropriate to form them as one of the tools for such development managing.
Keywords: Integrated development of rural areas, development practice, database, sociological research, tool.
DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-101-30-35

References:

1. Добрунова, А. И. Развитие инфраструктуры сельских территорий на основе частно-государственного партнерства / А. И. Добрунова, А. А. Сидоренко, Н. П. Епифанцев. - Текст: непосредственный // Инновации в АПК: проблемы и перспективы: теоретический и научно-практический журнал. - 2015. - № 1. - С. 54-60.
2. Захаров, Р. В. О природе, сущности и эффективности выполнения функций государственного управления сельскими территориями / Р. В. Захаров. - Текст : непосредственный // Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий : теоретический и научно-практический журнал. - 2021. - № 3. - С. 50-55.
3. Зелинская, М. В. Уровень качества жизни населения как фактор устойчивого развития сельских территорий Краснодарского края / М. В. Зелинская, Л. В. Коваленко // Управленческий учет. - 2022. - № 6-1. - С. 87-93.
4. Клочко, Е. Н. Реализация программно-целевого метода регулирования этнического туризма в системе комплексного развития сельских территорий Краснодарского края / Е. Н. Клочко, Л. В. Коваленко // Sochi journal of economy. - 2021. - № 15. - Т. 15. - С. 360-365.
5. Опрос на тему: «Востребованность успешных практик российского и международного опыта в области управления сельскими территориями». - [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа: [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1CTx00EyLtgFUu9s67seeSNuAH122ylXQ4DSb0Ix6Tk/edit].

Authors:

1. Kovalenko Lidia Vladimirovna, PhD in Philosophy, associate professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin".
2. Kokurina Kristina Denisovna, graduate student, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin".
3. Romanov Timur Romanovich, graduate student, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin".