<<<  Back

2016, № 62

UDC: 636.085.14
GSNTI: 68.39.15

Nutrient digestibility of complete feed with rapeseeds of Kuban selection

In the experiment young geese (Lindovskaya breed, n = 38) of the first control group received complete feed (CF) without sunflower oil and rapeseed. In the second group analogues feed was received by periods of growth (starter-grower-finisher) CF with 2,0; 2,6 and 3,6% of sunflower oil. The third group of geese in the reference period was fed with 5,0; 6,7 and 9,1% of ground rapeseeds, respectively. The fourth group was fed according to the scheme of the third group, but with the addition in the CF of 0,1% «CelloLyux-F» complex enzyme preparation. Differences in CF between control and experimental groups were only in the level of crude fat and linoleic acid. Using of sunflower oil tended to decrease the digestibility of organic matter of the CF by 4,1%, crude oil - by 8.7% and crude fiber - by 8,8%, compared to the values in the first group. However, utilization of the nitrogen digested from CF in the body of the second group of poultry was maximal. The authors note that probably the addition of sunflower oil in complete feed, rich in polyunsaturated linoleic acid, worsened the activity of cellulolytic bacteria of the intestine of young geese, but had no effect on the efficiency of nitrogen utilization, passed through the intestinal wall. The best nutrient digestibility was found in the fourth group, where a complex enzyme preparation «CelloLyux-F» was added into complete feed with the seeds of rape. Most profit from growing geese was in the fourth group - by 3,7% more than in the control group.
Keywords: Rape seeds, sunflower oil, young geese, complete feed, digestibility, economic efficiency
DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-62-152-156

References:

1. Вороков, В. Х. Оценка ремонтного молодняка кросса «Анак» / В. Х. Вороков, М. К. Кожоков // Птицеводство. - 2002. - № 5. - С. 9-10.
2. Зибров, C. H. Голозерный овес в комбикормах для перепелов / C. H. Зибров, А. Н. Ратошный // Зоотехния. - 2011. - № 8. - С. 14-15.
3. Кононенко, С. И. Влияние гранулирования комбикормов на здоровье свиней / С. И. Кононенко, А. Е. Чиков, Д. В. Осепчук, В. И. Бондаренко // Ветеринария Кубани. - 2011. - № 5. - С. 29-30.
4. Кощаев, А. Г. Биотехнология получения и консервирования сока люцерны и испытания коагулята на птице / А. Г. Кощаев // Труды Кубанского государственного аграрного университета. - 2006. - № 3. - С. 222-234.
5. Осепчук, Д. Рапс в кормлении цыплят-бройлеров / Д. Осепчук // Птицеводство. - 2006. - № 12. - С. 9.
6. Пономаренко, Ю. Рапс и продукты его переработки для птицеводства / Ю. Пономаренко // Комбикорма. - 2012. - № 4. - C. 57-59.
7. Пышманцева, Н. А. Влияние энтеросорбента «Ковелос» на микрофлору кишечника цыплят-бройлеров / Н. А. Пышманцева, З. В. Псхациева, О. Р. Фарниева // Известия Горского государственного аграрного университета. - 2013. - Т. 50. - № 2. - С. 113-115.
8. Щербатова, Т. Н. Повышение эффективности содержания племенной птицы / Т. Н. Щербатова, В. И. Щербатов // Международный сельскохозяйственный журнал. - 1994. - № 3. - С. 51.
9. Khajali, F. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry / F. Khajali, B. A. Slominski // Poult. Sci. - 2012. - Vol. 91. - I. 10. - P. 2564-2575.

Authors:

1. Osepchuk Denis Vasilievich, Dr. Agricultural Sciences, head of the Department of animal husbandry technology, North-Caucasus Research Institute of Animal Husbandry.
2. Vorokov Vitaly Khakyashevich, Dr. Agricultural Sciences, professor, Dean of the faculty of zootechnology and management, I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University.
3. Ratoshny Alexander Nikolaevich, Dr. Agricultural Sciences, professor, Deputy head of the Department of physi-ology and feeding of agricultural animals, I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University.
4. Utizhev Arsen Zramukovich, Dr. Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Animal Husbandry, Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V.M. Kokov.