<<<  Back

2019, № 78

UDC: 338.43:631.147
GSNTI: 68.75.19

Methodological features of assessing the economic efficiency of the transition to organic agriculture technologies

The methodological features of assessing the economic efficiency of the transition of producers to organic agriculture technologies were identified and justified, including the determination of the need for investments in the implementation of such projects and the size of the expected annual economic effect generated by them. It has been established that the economic justification of the feasibility of producing organic products in a specific agricultural organization must be carried out in relation to the entire system of organic crop rotation being formed, and not to its individual crops. It is proposed to take into account the lost profits of producers as a result of removing land plots from the existing economic turnover for organizing of organic production as a special type of investment. It was determined that the economic effect of the transition of producers to organic farming technologies is due to the price premiums on organic products existing in food markets, additional government support for organic production, as well as saving production costs as a result of the complete abandonment of the use of chemical materials. The expected changes in the structure of production resources of agricultural organizations that are transitioning to organic farming technologies are established. The main sources of uncertainty and risk in organic agriculture and methodological features of a quantitative assessment of their level are substantiated. The analysis of the main methods for assessing the riskiness of investment projects is carried out and recommendations for their use in relation to organic agriculture are proposed.
Keywords: Organic farming, the economic effect, effectiveness evaluation methodology, risk assessment
DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-78-15-20

References:

1. Воронкова, О. Ю. Формирование и реализация концепции развития органически ориентированной аграрной политики на уровне субъекта РФ / О. Ю. Воронкова // Экономика и предпринимательство. - 2014. - № 10 (51). - С. 968-972.
2. Кошелев, В. М. Анализ рисков инвестиционных проектов производства продукции органического сельского хозяйства / В. М. Кошелев, А. В. Пешкова // Вестник Воронежского государственного аграрного университета. - 2013. - № 1. - С. 395-397.
3. Кошелев, В. М. Особенности применения методики анализа инновационных инвестиционных проектов развития производства органической продукции / В. М. Кошелев, А. В. Пешкова // Вестник Бурятской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии им. В. Р. Филиппова. - 2013. - № 1 (30). - С. 132-136.
4. Сайфетдинов, А. Р. Тенденции развития и факторы эффективности производства продукции органического сельского хозяйства в России / А. Р. Сайфетдинов, Н. Р. Сайфетдинова, А. В. Ульянов // Труды Кубанского государственного аграрного университета. - 2019. - № 1(76). - С. 73-80.
5. Соколова, Ж. Е. Россия на мировом рынке органической продукции: возможности и проблемы в контексте национальной и продовольственной безопасности / Ж. Е. Соколова, В. В. Таран // Экономика и предпринимательство. - 2017. - № 8-3 (85-3). - С. 159-167.
6. Соколова, Ж. Е. Актуальные вопросы стандартизации продукции органического производства в России / Ж. Е. Соколова, Н. Д. Аварский, В. В. Таран, Х. Н. Гасанова // Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий. - 2015. - № 6. - С. 53-58.
7. Тюпаков, К. Э. Современное состояние государственной поддержки сельского хозяйства России / К. Э. Тюпаков // Труды Кубанского государственного аграрного университета. - 2016. - № 63. - С. 40-47.
8. Chavas, J. P. (2009). Organic and conventional production systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials: 2. Economic and risk analysis 1993 / J. P. Chavas, J. L. Posner, J. L Hedtcke. -2006. Agronomy Journal, 101, 2, 288-295.
9. Goklany, I. M. (2002). The ins and outs of organic farming / I. M. Goklany, P. Mader, A. Fliebbach, D. Dubois, L. Gunst, P. Fried, U. Niggli. Science, 298, 1889-1890.
10. Pimentel, D. P. (2005). Environmental, energetic and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems / D. P. Pimentel, J. Hepperly, J. Hanson, D. Doubs, R. Seidel. Bioscience, 55, 573-582.
11. Posner, J. L. (2008). Organic and conventional production systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials: 1. Productivity 1990-2002 / J. L. Posner, J. O. Baldock, J. L. Hedtcke. Agronomy Journal, 100, 253-260.

Authors:

1. Bershitsky Yury Iosifovich, DSc in Engineering, Phd in Economics, Professor, Head of the Department; Department of the organization of production and innovation activities, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”.
2. Saifetdinov Alexander Rafailovich, Phd in Economics, Associate Professor; Department of the organization of production and innovation activities, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”.
3. Ulyanov Alexander Vladimirovich, graduate student; Department of the organization of production and innovation activities, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”.