<<<  Back

2019, № 77

UDC: 638.1
GSNTI: 68.39.43

Significance and place of beekeeping in industrial agricolus

The article presents the results of research on the use of bees in the sunflower agrocoenosis. In the Agrarian and Industrial Ccomplex, two thirds of the grown crops are enotomophilic and need pollination. The use of plant protection chemicals has led to the disappearance of a large number of insects-natural pollinators. Therefore, in the modern industrial agrocoenosis, the role of honey bees has increased, which is associated with the possibility of their breeding and increase in number, as well as the ability to exist in controlled conditions created by man. Bee pollinating is the most effective way to increase yields. The decrease in the potential productivity of sunflower, the main entomophilous crop of the south in Russia, is due to undernapulation. Multifactorial contamination of agrobiocenosis through trophic chains adversely affected the state and pollinating function of bees. Only in the Krasnodar Territory due to the lack of bee colonies, according to the Ministry of Agriculture of Kuban, about 5.5 billion rubles are lost. To ensure full pollination of entomophilous agricultural crops existing in the Russian Federation more than 7 million bee colonies are required. Along with this, it is necessary to carry out technical re-equipment of the industry. An important element of the modern technology of intensive beekeeping is the creation of a feed conveyor due to the frequent movement of the apiary to the honey bearing plants, which is ensured by the use of mobile honey pavilion-type pollination complexes. Conducted research evaluating the effectiveness of sunflower pollination in the Krasnodar Territory found an increase in the yield of sunflower by 15-18% with a high rate of honey collection.
Keywords: Bees, agrocenosis, entomophilous crops, sunflower, bee pollinating, honey-pollination complexes, yield
DOI: 10.21515/1999-1703-77-161-165

References:

1. Воробев, С. П. Факторы экономической эффективности производства семян подсолнечника / С. П Воробьев, Г. М. Гриценко, В. В. Воробьева // Молочно-хозяйственный вестник. - 2017. - № 4. - С. 165-173.
2. Гасанов, А. Р. Эколого-экономический анализ развития пчеловодства в Дагестане / А. Р. Гасанов, М. А. Абакарова // Юг России: экология, развитие. - 2009. - № 4. - С. 88-94.
3. Кашина, Г. В. Исследование антропогенно-экологического воздействия на биологические аспекты развития медоносных пчел / Г. В. Кашина, А. С. Кашин // Вестник Красноярского ГАУ. - 2007. - № 2. - С. 203-206.
4. Комлацкий, В. И. Мобильно-опылительные комплексы как парадигма индустриального пчеловодства / В. И. Комлацкий // Политематический сетевой электронный научный журнал КубГАУ. - 2016. - № 118 (04).
5. Комлацкий, В. И. Пчеловодство / В. И. Комлацкий. - Ростов н/Д : Феникс, 2013. - 412 с.
6. Кулаков, В. Н. Оценка нектарной и медовой продуктивности растений / В. Н. Кулаков // Пчеловодство. - 2007. - № 5. - С. 24-26.
7. Свистунов, С. В. Новый вектор развития пчеловодства / С. В. Свистунов, Н. Н. Смирнов // Животноводство Юга России. - 2018. - № 2 (28). - С. 16-17.

Authors:

1. Komlatskiy Vasiliy Ivanovich, DSc in Agriculture, professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”.
2. Strel'bitskaya Olesya Viktorovna, postgraduate, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”.
3. Kupchenko Aleksandr Aleksandrovich, postgraduate, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “I.T. Trubilin Kuban State Agrarian University”.